All lawyers must deal with a list of responsibilities. Any one of the might be hard to reach. Still, every injury lawyer should make a point of answering any communication from a client. Those lawyers that do not meet their responsibilities do provide their clients with a reason for weighing the pros and cons that would be linked with hiring a new lawyer.
In fact, a lawyer’s list of potential pitfalls, mistakes that could trigger loss of a client would be short, but would probably include mention of the communication issue. At the same time, it might mention the wisdom behind having a respectful, rather than a rude attitude toward all clients. Naturally, such a list would also warn against committing foolish errors, such as missing a deadline.
Why the client’s response to such problems does not have to involve the act of changing lawyers
The injury lawyer in Grand Prairie for a given client might feel more comfortable discussing a case on the phone. In that instance, a client’s repeated emails might get overlooked. The client’s response might consist of switching from the sending of emails to the making of phone calls. Still, if that solved the problem, the accommodating client would still have the right to ask why there had been no response to the earlier communications.
Someone that objects to a lawyer’s attitude ought to ask this question: Would a lawyer with a better attitude offer enough benefits to make up for the loss of acquired information. After all an injury lawyer’s rudeness might get used as a tool, during a quest for evidence. In that case, a client’s decision to switch lawyers would demand abandonment of all the information gathered by the original and reportedly rude injury lawyer.
An experienced lawyer would appreciate a client’s level of annoyance, if a less-experienced injury lawyer missed a deadline. Still every practicing lawyer has liability insurance. Consequently, that same injury lawyer’s client does have a path to take, in order to gain recourse for a hired lawyer’s poor performance. A client has the right to take that path, if a hired legal counsel has made a mistake.
Why it makes sense to consider the alternative responses
As mentioned above, any member of the legal system has the ability to gather valuable bits of information. That same information would not get transferred quickly to any new lawyer. Yet a judge might not care about the client’s self-inflicted problem.
Hence, it could be that the new lawyer-client team would lack the information requested by a judge. Furthermore, that judge might be unwilling to extend an established deadline. In such a situation, one fateful move, namely that of changing lawyers could force a plaintiff to deal with some unpleasant consequences.