Injury lawyers in Calgary help those with a disability to prove that their condition keeps them from holding down a steady job.
A disability attorney has become familiar with medical evidence.
The best such evidence lacks any irrelevant information. By the same token, it does not overlook any item of relevance to the case being presented. Sometimes a disability lawyer might urge a client to take a specific test.
Disability lawyers help their clients to communicate with their doctors.
An experienced disability attorney respects doctors’ questions and concerns. Hence, each of them should increase the chances that a client might gain cooperation from a physician.
A lawyer that works with disabled clients has gained a familiarity with local Administrative Law judges.
Each judge has a preference for how the hearing should be conducted. The lawyer’s familiarity with that preference should prove of value to the same lawyer’s client. Some judges tend to raise specific questions. An attorney’s knowledge of a given client’s medical history could reveal the ease or difficulty that the client might have, if asked one of the judge’s favored questions.
Lawyers that have read about different disabilities understand how to deal with contentious issues.
Each of them can spot ways that clients’ medical histories might contain bad facts. Each of them has learned how to address such bad facts. During the hearing, a witness could introduce negative testimony. Lawyers’ experience helps them to counter such testimony.
A disability lawyer appreciates the need to address the most pressing question: Is this person’s disability an actual impairment in the typical workplace situation?
Often, a local Administrative Law judge has created a list of questions that are meant to help with obtaining a clear answer to that pressing question. For instance, at a hearing an Administrative Law judge might ask this question: Did you ever fall over unexpectedly?
Obviously, no employer would want to hire a worker that might suddenly fall over. If the questioned person could give examples of times when he or she had fallen down, at home or at work, then that would work to support the request for recognition of his or her status, as a disabled person.
The purpose of the hearing is to weed out those that are trying to fake their disability. The experienced judge has learned how to spot such fakers. By posing certain questions, the judge’s familiarity with weak answers accounts for the same judge’s willingness to accept a quick and clear answer.
If necessary, a lawyer might supplement a fairly decent answer. Yet the same professional would never try to follow a suitable answer with a large amount of irrelevant information. That fact should underscore the nature of the lawyer’s assistance.